Control system and method with constant maximum current for power converter protection

ABSTRACT

System and method for protecting a power converter. The system includes a first comparator configured to receive a threshold signal and a first signal and to generate a comparison signal. The first signal is a sum of a second signal and a third signal, and the third signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the system includes a pulse-width-modulation generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to the comparison signal, and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and control the input current for the power converter. An amplitude for the first signal becomes larger if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger. The second signal is generated by receiving an input voltage for the power converter, converting the received input voltage to a fourth signal, and converting the fourth signal to the second signal.

CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/213,657, filed Aug. 26, 2005, which claims priority to Chinese Patent Application No. 200510029016.6, filed Aug. 18, 2005, entitled “Control System and Method with Constant Maximum Current for Power Converter Protection,” by inventors Lieyi Fang, Shifeng Zhao, Bo Li, and Zhiliang Chen, commonly assigned, both applications being incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.

Additionally, this application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/051,242 , commonly assigned, incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.

STATEMENT AS TO RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable

REFERENCE TO A “SEQUENCE LISTING,” A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING APPENDIX SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISK

Not Applicable

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to integrated circuits. More particularly, the invention provides a control system and method for over-current protection with constant maximum current. Merely by way of example, the invention has been applied to a power converter. But it would be recognized that the invention has a much broader range of applicability.

Power converters are widely used for consumer electronics such as portable devices. The power converters can convert electric power from one form to another form. As an example, the electric power is transformed from alternate current (AC) to direct current (DC), from DC to AC, from AC to AC, or from DC to DC. Additionally, the power converters can convert the electric power from one voltage level to another voltage level.

The power converters include linear converters and switch-mode converters. The switch-mode converters often use pulse-width-modulated (PWM) or pulse-frequency-modulated mechanisms. These mechanisms are usually implemented with a switch-mode controller including various protection components. These components can provide over-voltage protection, over-temperature protection, and over-current protection (OCP). These protections can often prevent the power converters and connected circuitries from suffering permanent damage.

For example, a power converter includes a power switch and transformer winding that is in series with the power switch. The current flowing through the power switch and transformer winding may be limited by an OCP system. If the OCP system is not effective, the current can reach a level at which damage to the power switch is imminent due to excessive current and voltage stress at switching or thermal run-away during operation. For example, this current level can be reached when the output short circuit or over loading occurs. Consequently, the rectifier components on the transformer secondary side are subject to permanent damage due to excessive voltage and current stress in many offline flyback converters. Hence an effective OCP system is important for a reliable switch mode converter.

FIG. 1 is a simplified conventional switch mode converter with over-current protection. A switch mode converter 100 includes an OCP comparator 110, a PWM controller component 120, a gate driver 130, a power switch 140, resistors 150, 152, 154, and 156, and a primary winding 160. For example, the OCP comparator 110, the PWM controller component 120, and the gate driver 130 are parts of a chip 180 for PWM control. When the current of the primary winding is greater than a limiting level, the PWM controller component 120 turns off the power switch 140 and shuts down the switch mode power converter 100.

For switch mode converter, a cycle-by-cycle or pulse-by-pulse control mechanism is often used for OCP. For example, the cycle-by-cycle control scheme limits the maximum current and thus the maximum power delivered by the switch mode converter. This limitation on maximum power can protect the power converter from thermal run-away. Some conventional OCP systems use an adjustable OCP threshold value based on line input voltage, but the actual limitation on maximum current and thus maximum power is not always constant over a wide range of line input voltage. Other conventional OCP systems use additional resistors 152 and 154 that are external to the chip 180 and inserted between V_(in) and the resistor 150 as shown in FIG. 1. But the resistor 152 consumes significant power, which often is undesirable for meeting stringent requirements on low standby power. For example, the resistor 152 of 2 MΩ can dissipate about 70 mW with input AC voltage of 264 volts.

Hence it is highly desirable to improve techniques for over-current protection.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to integrated circuits. More particularly, the invention provides a control system and method for over-current protection with constant maximum current. Merely by way of example, the invention has been applied to a power converter. But it would be recognized that the invention has a much broader range of applicability.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, a system for protecting a power converter is provided. The system includes a first comparator configured to receive a threshold signal and a first signal and to generate a comparison signal. The first signal is a sum of a second signal and a third signal, and the third signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the system includes a pulse-width-modulation generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to the comparison signal, and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and control the input current for the power converter. An amplitude for the first signal becomes larger if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger. The second signal is generated by receiving an input voltage for the power converter, converting the received input voltage to a fourth signal, and converting the fourth signal to the second signal.

According to another embodiment, a system for protecting a power converter includes a first comparator configured to receive a first signal and a second signal and to generate a comparison signal. The first signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the system includes a threshold generator configured to receive at least a third signal and generate the second signal in response to at least the third signal. The third signal is associated with an input voltage for the power converter. Moreover, the system includes a pulse-width-modulation generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to the comparison signal, and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and control the input current for the power converter. An amplitude for the second signal becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger, and the third signal is generated by receiving an input voltage for the power converter and converting the received input voltage to the third signal.

According to yet another embodiment, a system for protecting a power converter includes a first comparator configured to receive a threshold signal and a first signal and to generate a comparison signal. The first signal is equal to a second signal subtracted by a third signal, and the second signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the system includes a pulse-width-modulation generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to the comparison signal, and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and control the input current for the power converter. Moreover, the system includes an oscillator coupled to the pulse-width-modulation generator and configured to generate at least a first control signal, a transconductor configured to receive the first control signal and generate a second control signal, and a current supplier configured to receive the second control signal and generate a first current in response to the second control signal, the first current being associated with the third signal. An amplitude for the first current becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger.

According to yet another embodiment, a method for protecting a power converter includes receiving an input voltage for a power converter, converting the received input voltage to a first signal, converting the first signal to a second signal, and generating a third signal based on at least information associated with the second signal. Additionally, the method includes receiving the third signal and a threshold signal. The third signal is a sum of the second signal and a fourth signal, and the fourth signal is associated with an input current for the power converter. Moreover, the method includes generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the third signal and the threshold signal, and processing information associated with the comparison signal. Also, the method includes generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal, and controlling the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal. An amplitude for the third signal becomes larger if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger.

According to yet another embodiment, a method for protecting a power converter includes receiving an input voltage for a power converter, converting the received input voltage to a first signal, processing information associated with the first signal, generating a second signal based on at least information associated with the first signal, and receiving the second signal and a third signal. The third signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the method includes generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the second signal and the third signal, processing information associated with the comparison signal, generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal, and controlling the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal. An amplitude for the second signal becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger.

According to yet another embodiment, a method for protecting a power converter includes generating a first signal based on at least information associated with an input current for a power converter, generating a second signal, the second signal being proportional to a ramping current, and processing information associated with the first signal and the second signal. Additionally, the method includes generating a third signal equal to the first signal subtracted by the second signal, receiving the third signal and a threshold signal, generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the third signal and the threshold signal, processing information associated with the comparison signal, generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal, and controlling the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal. An amplitude for the ramping current corresponding to a predetermined value for the input current becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger.

Many benefits are achieved by way of the present invention over conventional techniques. For example, some embodiments can provide an excellent compensation for the “delay to output” by easily adjusting an external resistor. For example, the adjustment of the external resistor takes into account converter components external to a chip for PWM control. Certain embodiments allow a maximum current and a maximum power that are constant over a wide range of input voltage. Some embodiments consume a low standby power by sharing a resistor for a sensing system with a startup system and/or a brownout protection system. For example, the resistor is shared by a sensing system and a startup system. Certain embodiments provide an excellent compensation for the “delay to output” without sensing an input voltage. For example, the pin counts for a chip for PWM control is limited. In another example, the maximum width of a PWM signal is used to represent the input voltage. Different input voltages result in different maximum widths for the PWM signal, and the different maximum widths result in different effective threshold signals. Some embodiments provide an over-current protection that can effectively protect a power converter from excessive power, thermal run away, excessive current and/or voltage stress.

Various additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention can be more fully appreciated with reference to the detailed description and the accompanying drawings that follow.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a simplified conventional switch mode converter with over-current protection;

FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between extra current ramping amplitude and line input voltage;

FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between current threshold and line input voltage;

FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between threshold offset and line input voltage;

FIG. 5 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to yet another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to yet another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 10 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between PWM signal maximum width and input voltage according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 11 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to yet another embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to integrated circuits. More particularly, the invention provides a control system and method for over-current protection with constant maximum current. Merely by way of example, the invention has been applied to a power converter. But it would be recognized that the invention has a much broader range of applicability.

As shown in FIG. 1, the current limit is expressed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {I_{Limit} = {{\frac{V_{i\; n}}{L_{p}} \times t_{on}} = \frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 1} \right) \end{matrix}$

where I_(Limit) represents the current limit. For example, the current limit is the current threshold for triggering over-current protection. Additionally, V_(in) is the input line voltage at node 190, and V_(th) _(—) _(oc) is the voltage level at an input terminal 112 of the OCP comparator 110. R_(S) is the resistance of the resistor 150, and L_(p) is the inductance of the primary winding 160. Moreover, t_(on) represents on time of the power switch 140 for each cycle. Accordingly, the maximum energy E stored in the primary winding 160 is

$\begin{matrix} {ɛ = {{\frac{1}{2} \times L_{p} \times I_{Limit}^{2}} = {PT}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 2} \right) \end{matrix}$

where T represents the clock period, and P represents the maximum power. So the maximum power P can be expressed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {P = {\frac{L_{p} \times I_{Limit}^{2}}{2T} = \frac{V_{i\; n} \times t_{on}^{2}}{2 \times L_{p} \times T}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 3} \right) \end{matrix}$

Therefore the power can be limited by controlling the current limit I_(Limit). But Equation 3 does not take into account the “delay to output” that includes the propagation delay through a current sense path to the power switch 140. For example, the propagation delay includes propagation delays through the OCP comparator 110, the PWM controller component 120, the gate driver 130, and the response delay of turning off of the power switch 140. During the “delay to output,” the power switch 140 remains on, and the input current through the switch 140 keeps ramping up despite the current has already reached the threshold level of the OCP comparator 110. The extra current ramping amplitude, ΔI, due the “delay to output” is proportional to the line input voltage V_(in) as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta\; I} = {\frac{V_{i\; n}}{L_{p}} \times T_{delay}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 4} \right) \end{matrix}$

where T_(delay) represents the “delay to output.” FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between extra current ramping amplitude and line input voltage. As shown in FIG. 2, the actual maximum current I_(PEAK1) that corresponds to higher V_(in) is larger than the actual maximum current I_(PEAK2) that corresponds to lower V_(in). Accordingly, the actual maximum power is not constant over a wide range of line input voltage. Hence the actual maximum power is expressed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {P = {\frac{L_{p} \times \left( {I_{Limit} + {\Delta\; I}} \right)^{2}}{2T} = \frac{V_{i\; n} \times \left( {t_{on} + T_{delay}} \right)^{2}}{2 \times L_{p} \times T}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 5} \right) \end{matrix}$

For example, T_(delay) depends on internal delays, gate charges, and circuitry related to the gate driver 130. In another example, for the predetermined switch mode converter 100, T_(delay) is constant, and hence the actual maximum power depends on the line input voltage. To compensate for variations of the actual maximum power, the threshold for over-current protection should be adjusted based on the input line voltage.

FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between current threshold and line input voltage. The line input voltage V_(in2) is lower than the line input voltage V_(in1), and the current threshold I_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(vin2) for V_(in2) is larger than I_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(vin1) for V_(in1) as shown in FIG. 3. The current threshold decreases with increasing line input voltage V_(in). At the current threshold, the over-current protection is triggered. The resulting maximum current I_(PEAK1) for higher V_(in) is the same as the resulting maximum current I_(PEAK2) for lower V_(in).

For example, the current threshold has the following relationship with the line input voltage:

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} \approx {{I_{th\_ oc}\left( V_{i\; n\; 1} \right)} - {\frac{V_{i\; n} - V_{i\; n\; 1}}{L_{p}}T_{delay}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 6} \right) \end{matrix}$

where I_(th) _(—) _(oc) is the current threshold, V_(in) is the line input voltage, L_(p) is the inductance of the primary winding, and T_(delay) is the “delay to output. Additionally, I_(th) _(—) _(oc)(V_(in1)) is the current threshold that is predetermined for the input line voltage V_(in1). For example, V_(in1) is the minimum line input voltage. In another example, the current is sensed that flows through the power switch and the primary winding. If the sensed current reaches I_(th) _(—) _(oc), the PWM controller component sends a signal to turn off the power switch. After “delay to output,” the power switch is turned off.

In Equation 6, the second term

$\frac{V_{i\; n} - V_{i\; n\; 1}}{L_{p}}T_{delay}$ represents a threshold offset to compensate for the effects of “delay to output.” FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between threshold offset and line input voltage. As shown in FIG. 4, the term

$\frac{T_{delay}}{L_{p}}$ is the slop that depends on the “delay to output” and the inductance of primary winding. As shown in FIG. 4, the current threshold decreases with increasing line input voltage.

For certain applications, it is difficult to estimate the threshold offset on chip for PWM control in order to compensate for the “delay to output.” For example, T_(delay) depends on converter components that are internal and as well as external to the chip. The external components may include a power MOSFET. Different types of power MOSFETs can have different gate charges, which in turn result in different “delays to output.” Also, the external components may include the primary winding. Different types of primary windings can have different inductance values. In another example, the gate driver on the chip is intentionally made slow for longer T_(delay).

Certain embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods that allow maximum currents that are constant over wide range of input voltage. For example, these systems and methods are implemented in switch mode converters. In another example, the input voltage is the input line voltage for power converters.

In some embodiments, the input voltage is sensed and used to control a current source. The current source outputs a current that is used to generate an offset signal through an adjustable resistor. For example, the adjustable resistor is external to a chip for PWM control. The offset signal is superimposed on a current sensing signal, and this superimposition provides a threshold offset to a predetermined current threshold as shown in Equation 6.

These embodiments of the present invention include examples of FIGS. 5 through 9. FIGS. 5-9 are simplified control systems with constant maximum current according to certain embodiments of the present invention. These diagrams are merely examples, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications.

As shown in FIGS. 5-7, an input voltage V_(in) is sensed and used to control a current source. The current source generates a current I_(—) _(vin) as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {I_{\_ vin} = {\alpha\;\frac{V_{i\; n}}{R_{sv}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 7} \right) \end{matrix}$

where α is a constant. The current I_(—) _(vin) is used to generate an offset signal through an adjustable resistor R. For FIGS. 5 and 6, the offset signal is superimposed to a current sensing signal. Accordingly, an input signal to a comparator is the summation of sensed signal I_(sense)×R_(S) and the offset signal I_(—) _(vin) R. If the input signal reaches the threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc), a gate driver is commanded to turn off a power switch. Accordingly, when the over-current protection is triggered, I _(sense) ×R _(S) +I _(—) _(vin) ×R=V _(th) _(—) _(oc)  (Equation 8A)

The effective threshold signal I_(th) _(—) _(oc) is

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = \frac{I_{sense}}{R_{s}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 9} \right) \end{matrix}$

Therefore,

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = {{\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} - \frac{I_{\_ vin} \times R}{R_{s}}} = {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} - \frac{\alpha \times {Vin} \times R}{R_{s} \times R_{sv}}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 10} \right) \end{matrix}$

From Equations 6 and 10, the following relationship can be derived:

$\begin{matrix} {{I_{th\_ oc}\left( V_{i\; n\; 1} \right)} = {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} - {\frac{V_{{i\; n\; 1}\;}}{L_{p}}T_{delay}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 11} \right) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} {{{and}\mspace{14mu}\frac{V_{i\; n}}{L_{p}}T_{delay}} = \frac{\alpha \times V_{i\; n} \times R}{R_{s} \times R_{sv}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 12} \right) \end{matrix}$

According

$\begin{matrix} {R = {\frac{R_{s} \times R_{sv}}{\alpha\; L_{p}}T_{delay}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 13} \right) \end{matrix}$

Hence the effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R for given L_(p), R_(SV), and R_(S) in a switching mode converter.

For FIG. 7, the offset signal is subtracted from the threshold signal to generate an effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff). The effective threshold signal is provided to a comparator. Another input of the comparator receives the sensed signal I_(sense)×R_(S). If the sensed signal reaches the effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff), a gate driver is commanded to turn off a power switch. Accordingly, when the over-current protection is triggered, I _(sense) ×R _(S) =V _(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff) =V _(th) _(—) _(oc) −I _(—) _(vin) ×R  (Equation 8B)

Therefore, Equations 9-13 are still valid. The effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R for given L_(p), R_(SV), and R_(S) in a switching mode converter.

FIG. 5 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to an embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. A system 500 includes resistors 510, 512, and 514, current suppliers 520 and 522, a startup system 552, a comparator 530, a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) generator 540, a sensing system 550, a threshold generator 560, and a switch 570. Although the above has been shown using a selected group of components for the system 500, there can be many alternatives, modifications, and variations. For example, some of the components may be expanded and/or combined. Other components may be inserted to those noted above. For example, the system 500 includes an oscillator 580, which sends a clock signal and a ramping signal to the PWM generator 540. In another example, the system 500 includes a primary winding 582 with an inductance value of L_(p). Depending upon the embodiment, the arrangement of components may be interchanged with others replaced. For example, the system 500 is used to regulate a power converter. Further details of these components are found throughout the present specification and more particularly below.

For example, an input voltage V_(in) at node 590 is sensed by the sensing system 550 through the resistor 512 of R_(SV). In one embodiment, the resistor 512 has a resistance value ranging from several hundred kilo-ohms to several mega-ohms. In another embodiment, the sensing system 550 sends a signal to the current supplier 520. For example, the current supplier 520 is a current source. The current supplier 520 generates a current I_(—) _(vin) flowing through the resistor 510 of R and generating an offset signal. The offset signal is superimposed to a current sensing signal. For example, the current sensing signal is generated by the resistor 514 of R_(S). The summation of the offset signal and the current sensing signal is provided to an input 532 of the comparator 530. For example, the summation is in the voltage domain. At the comparator 530, the summation is compared with a predetermined threshold signal generated by the threshold generator 560. For example, the threshold generator 560 receives a current I_(—) _(vin1) and a reference voltage V_(ref). Based on the comparison, the comparator 530 sends a signal to the PWM generator 540. For example, the PWM generator 540 includes a PWM comparator 542, a logic controller 544, and a gate driver 546. The logic controller receives the signal sent from the comparator 530. In another example, the PWM comparator 542 receives the clock signal and the ramping signal generated by the oscillator 580. The PWM generator 540 receives the signal from the comparator 530 and controls the switch 570 through the gate driver 546. Additionally, the sensing system 550 sends a signal to the current supplier 522 according to an embodiment of the present invention. For example, the current supplier 522 is a current source. The current supplier 522 generates the current I_(—) _(vin1) received by the threshold generator 560. The effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R. For example, the system 500 allows a maximum current that is constant over a wide range of the input voltage V_(in). In another example, the resistor 510 is adjusted for given L_(p), R_(SV), and R_(S) in a switching mode converter according to Equation 13. In yet another example, the startup system 552 is connected to the sensing system 550, and is used to control powering up of a chip for PWM control.

FIG. 6 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to an embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. A system 600 is an example of the system 500. As shown in FIG. 6, the input voltage V_(in) at the node 590 is converted by the resistor 512 of R_(SV) into a current. The current is sensed by a transistor 610 of MP1 through a voltage VDD at node 620. For example, the node 620 is connected to a capacitor 630 of C1, which is charged by the input voltage V_(in) and used to start up the chip for PWM control. In another example, the current I sensed by the transistor 620 is

$\begin{matrix} {I = {\frac{V_{i\; n} - {VDD}}{R_{sv}} \approx \frac{V_{i\; n}}{R_{sv}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 14} \right) \end{matrix}$

where VDD is negligible in comparison with V_(in). Therefore the sensed current I is a function of the input voltage V_(in). As shown in FIG. 6, the sensed current is mirrored by another transistor 612 of MP2 to generate another current I1. For example, the current mirror includes both the transistors 610 and 612. The current I1 is further mirrored by a transistor 614 of MN1 and a transistor 616 of MN2 to generate a current 12. The current 12 is mirrored by a transistor 618 of MP3 and a transistor 619 of MP4 to generate a current I_(—) _(vin) . For example, the cascade transistors are used to boost the output impedance of the current mirrors. In another example, the current I_(—) _(vin) is proportional to the current I sensed by the transistor 620. The current I_(—) _(vin) is used to generate the offset signal through the resistor 510 of R. The offset signal is superimposed to the current sensing signal. The generated signal V_(cs) at node 622 is V _(cs) =I _(sense) ×R _(S) +I _(—) _(vin) ×R  (Equation 15)

As shown in FIG. 6, the signal V_(cs) is provided to an input 532 of the comparator 530. At the comparator 530, the signal V_(cs) is compared with a predetermined threshold signal generated by the threshold generator 560. In response, the comparator 530 sends a signal to the PWM generator 540, which controls the switch 570. Additionally, transistors 640 and 642 generate the current I_(—) _(vin1) , which is received by the threshold generator 560.

FIG. 7 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to another embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. A system 700 includes resistors 710, 712, and 714, a current supplier 720, a startup system 752, a comparator 730, a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) generator 740, a sensing system 750, a threshold generator 760, and a switch 770. Although the above has been shown using a selected group of components for the system 700, there can be many alternatives, modifications, and variations. For example, some of the components may be expanded and/or combined. Other components may be inserted to those noted above. For example, the system 700 includes an oscillator 780, which sends a clock signal and a ramping signal to the PWM generator 740. In another example, the system 700 includes a primary winding 782 with an inductance value of L_(p). In yet another embodiment, the system 700 includes a signal generator 762 for providing a voltage reference signal. Depending upon the embodiment, the arrangement of components may be interchanged with others replaced. For example, the system 700 is used to regulate a power converter. Further details of these components are found throughout the present specification and more particularly below.

For example, an input voltage V_(in) at node 790 is sensed by the sensing system 750 through the resistor 712 of R_(SV). In one embodiment, the resistor 712 has a resistance value ranging from several hundred kilo-ohms to several mega-ohms. In another embodiment, the sensing system 750 receives a signal from the startup system 752, and sends a signal to the current supplier 720. For example, the startup system 752 is connected to the input voltage V_(in) through the resistor 712, and is used to control powering up of a chip for PWM control. In another example, the current supplier is a current source. The current supplier generates a current I_(—) _(vin) in flowing through the resistor 710 of R and generating an offset signal. For example, the offset signal is an offset voltage. The offset signal is provided to the threshold generator 760, which also receives a voltage reference signal from the signal generator 762. The threshold generator 760 provides an effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff) to an input 734 of the comparator 730. Additionally, a current sensing signal is received by an input 732 of the comparator 730. For example, the current sensing signal is generated by the resistor 714 of R_(S). In another example, the current sensing signal is in the voltage domain.

At the comparator 730, the current sensing signal is compared with the effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff). Based on the comparison, the comparator 730 sends a signal to the PWM generator 740. For example, the PWM generator 740 includes a PWM comparator 742, a logic controller 744, and a gate driver 746. The logic controller receives the signal sent from the comparator 730. In another example, the PWM comparator 742 receives the clock signal and the ramping signal generated by the oscillator 780. The PWM generator 740 receives the signal from the comparator 730 and controls the switch 770 through the gate driver 746. The effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R. For example, the system 700 allows a maximum current that is constant over a wide range of the input voltage V_(in). In another example, the resistor R is adjusted for given L_(p), R_(SV), and R_(S) in a switching mode converter according to Equation 13.

According to other embodiments of the present invention, an input voltage V_(in) is sensed and used to control a current source as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9. The current source generates a current I_(—) _(vin) as follows: or I_(—) _(vin) =βV_(in)  (Equation 14)

where β is a constant. The current I_(—) _(vin) is used to generate an offset signal through an adjustable resistor R. For FIG. 8, the offset signal is superimposed to a current sensing signal. Accordingly, an input signal to a comparator is the summation of sensed signal I_(sense)×R_(S) and the offset signal I_(—) _(vin) ×R. If the input signal reaches the threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc), a gate driver is commanded to turn off a power switch. Accordingly, when the over-current protection is triggered, I_(sense)×R_(S)+I_(—) _(vin) ×R=V_(th) _(—) _(oc)  (Equation 15A)

The effective threshold signal I_(th) _(—) _(oc) is

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = \frac{I_{sense}}{R_{s}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 16} \right) \end{matrix}$

Therefore,

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = {{\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} - \frac{I_{\_ vin} \times R}{R_{s}}} = {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} - \frac{\beta \times V_{i\; n} \times R}{R_{s}}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 17} \right) \end{matrix}$

From Equations 6 and 17, the following relationship can be derived:

$\begin{matrix} {{I_{th\_ oc}\left( V_{i\; n\; 1} \right)} = {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} - {\frac{V_{i\; n\; 1}}{L_{p}}T_{delay}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 18} \right) \end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix} {{{and}\mspace{14mu}\frac{V_{i\; n}}{L_{p}}T_{delay}} = \frac{\beta \times V_{i\; n} \times R}{R_{s}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 19} \right) \end{matrix}$

According

$\begin{matrix} {R = {\frac{R_{s}}{\beta\; L_{p}}T_{delay}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 20} \right) \end{matrix}$

Hence the effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R for given L_(p) and R_(S) in a switching mode converter.

For FIG. 9, the offset signal is subtracted from the threshold signal to generate an effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff). The effective threshold signal is provided to a comparator. Another input of the comparator receives the sensed signal I_(sense)×R_(S). If the sensed signal reaches the effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff), a gate driver is commanded to turn off a power switch. Accordingly, when the over-current protection is triggered, I _(sense) ×R _(S) =V _(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff) =V _(th) _(—) _(oc) −I _(—) _(vin) ×R  (Equation 15B)

Therefore, Equations 16-20 are still valid. The effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R for given L_(p) and R_(S) in a switching mode converter.

FIG. 8 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to yet another embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. A system 800 includes resistors 810, 811, 812, and 814, a comparator 830, a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) generator 840, a sensing system 850, a transconductor 852, a threshold generator 860, and a switch 870. Although the above has been shown using a selected group of components for the system 800, there can be many alternatives, modifications, and variations. For example, some of the components may be expanded and/or combined. Other components may be inserted to those noted above. For example, the system 800 includes an oscillator, which sends a clock signal and a ramping signal to the PWM generator 840. In another example, the system 800 includes a primary winding 882 with an inductance value of L_(p). In yet another example, the system 800 includes a brownout protection system 854. Depending upon the embodiment, the arrangement of components may be interchanged with others replaced. For example, the system 800 is used to regulate a power converter. Further details of these components are found throughout the present specification and more particularly below.

For example, an input voltage V_(in) at node 890 is received by a voltage divider to generate a voltage βV_(in). For example, the voltage divider includes the resistors 811 and 812, which are external to the chip for PWM control. The voltage βV_(in) is received by the sensing system 850 to generate a voltage signal. The voltage signal is sent to the transconductor 852, which generates a current I_(—) _(vin) flowing through the resistor 810 of R and generating an offset signal. For example, the transconductor 852 is a voltage-controlled current source. The offset signal is superimposed to a current sensing signal. For example, the current sensing signal is generated by the resistor 814 of R_(S). The summation of the offset signal and the current sensing signal is provided to an input 832 of the comparator 830. For example, the summation is in the voltage domain. At the comparator 830, the summation is compared with a predetermined threshold signal generated by the threshold generator 860. Based on the comparison, the comparator 83 sends a signal to the PWM generator 840. For example, the PWM generator 840 includes a PWM comparator 842, a logic controller 844, and a gate driver 846. The logic controller receives the signal sent from the comparator 830. In another example, the PWM comparator 842 receives the clock signal and the ramping signal generated by the oscillator. The PWM generator 840 receives the signal from the comparator 830 and controls the switch 870 through the gate driver 846. The effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R. For example, the system 800 allows a maximum current that is constant over a wide range of the input voltage V_(in). In another example, the resistor 810 is adjusted for given L_(p) and R_(S) in a switching mode converter according to Equation 20. In yet another example, the brownout protection system 854 receives the voltage βV_(in), and is used to protect a switch-mode converter if an input voltage falls below a predetermined value.

FIG. 9 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to yet another embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. A system 900 includes resistors 910, 911, 912, and 914, a comparator 930, a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) generator 940, a sensing system 950, a transconductor 952, a threshold generator 960, and a switch 970. Although the above has been shown using a selected group of components for the system 900, there can be many alternatives, modifications, and variations. For example, some of the components may be expanded and/or combined. Other components may be inserted to those noted above. For example, the system 900 includes an oscillator, which sends a clock signal and a ramping signal to the PWM generator 940. In another example, the system 900 includes a primary winding 982 with an inductance value of L_(p). In yet another example, the system 900 includes a brownout protection system 954. In yet another embodiment, the system 900 includes a signal generator 962 for providing a voltage reference signal. Depending upon the embodiment, the arrangement of components may be interchanged with others replaced. For example, the system 900 is used to regulate a power converter. Further details of these components are found throughout the present specification and more particularly below.

For example, an input voltage V_(in) at node 990 is received by a voltage divider to generate a voltage βV_(in). For example, the voltage divider includes the resistors 911 and 912, which are external to the chip for PWM control. The voltage βV_(in) is received by the sensing system 950 to generate a voltage signal. The voltage signal is sent to the transconductor 952, which generates a current I_(—) _(vin) flowing through the resistor 910 of R and generating an offset signal. For example, the transconductor 852 is a voltage-controlled current source. In another example, the offset signal is an offset voltage. The offset signal is provided to the threshold generator 960, which also receives a voltage reference signal from the signal generator 962. The threshold generator 960 provides an effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff) to an input 934 of the comparator 930. Additionally, a current sensing signal is received by an input 932 of the comparator 930. For example, the current sensing signal is generated by the resistor 914 of R_(S). In another example, the current sensing signal is in the voltage domain.

At the comparator 930, the current sensing signal is compared with the effective threshold signal V_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) _(eff). Based on the comparison, the comparator 930 sends a signal to the PWM generator 940. For example, the PWM generator 940 includes a PWM comparator 942, a logic controller 944, and a gate driver 946. The logic controller receives the signal sent from the comparator 930. In another example, the PWM comparator 942 receives the clock signal and the ramping signal generated by the oscillator. The PWM generator 940 receives the signal from the comparator 930 and controls the switch 970 through the gate driver 946. The effects of “delay to output” can be compensated by adjusting the resistor R. For example, the system 900 allows a maximum current that is constant over a wide range of the input voltage V_(in). In another example, the resistor R is adjusted for given L_(p) and R_(S) in a switching mode converter according to Equation 20. In yet another example, the brownout protection system 954 receives the voltage βV_(in), and is used to protect a switch-mode converter if an input voltage falls below a predetermined value.

According to other embodiments of the present invention, an input voltage is sensed based on the maximum width of PWM signal. For example, the PWM signal is applied to the gate of a power switch in series to the primary winding of a power converter. FIG. 10 is a simplified diagram showing relationship between PWM signal maximum width and input voltage according to an embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. As shown in FIG. 5, the maximum current is constant with respect to input voltage, and the maximum width of PWM signal varies with the input voltage. For example, the input voltage is the input line voltage for power converter. In another example, the maximum current I_(PEAK1) equals the maximum current I_(PEAK2). The maximum current I_(PEAK1) corresponds to a higher input voltage and a PWM signal 510, and the maximum current I_(PEAK2) corresponds to a lower input voltage and a PWM signal 520. As shown in FIG. 5, the maximum width for the PWM signal 510 is narrower for higher input voltage, and the maximum width for PWM signal 520 is wider for lower input voltage. The input voltage is represented by the maximum width of PWM signal if the maximum current is constant with respect to input voltage. Accordingly, the maximum width of PWM signal can be used to determine the threshold offset to compensate for the effects of “delay to output” as shown in Equation 6.

In one embodiment, the compensation can be realized by generating a current threshold, I_(th) _(—) _(oc), which is a function of the maximum width of PWM signal as shown in FIG. 10. For example, the current threshold is equal to I_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) ₁ for the PWM signal 510 and I_(th) _(—) _(oc) _(—) ₂ for the PWM signal 520. In another example, the slope of I_(th) _(—) _(oc) with respect to the maximum width is properly chosen to compensate for the effects of “delay to output” according to Equation 6. The selected slope takes into account information about power converter components that are external to the chip for PWM control. For example, the external components include the primary winding, a current sensing resistor and a power MOSFET. This embodiment of the present invention includes certain examples of FIG. 11.

FIG. 11 is a simplified control system with constant maximum current according to yet another embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. A system 1100 includes resistors 1110, 1112, 1114, and 1116, a current supplier 1120, a startup system 1152, a comparator 1130, a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) generator 1140, a threshold generator 1160, and a switch 1170. Although the above has been shown using a selected group of components for the system 1100, there can be many alternatives, modifications, and variations. For example, some of the components may be expanded and/or combined. Other components may be inserted to those noted above. For example, the system 1100 includes an oscillator 1180, which sends a clock signal and a ramping signal to the PWM generator 1140. In another example, the system 1100 includes a primary winding 1182 with an inductance value of L_(p). Depending upon the embodiment, the arrangement of components may be interchanged with others replaced. For example, the system 1100 is used to regulate a power converter. In another example, the resistor 1116 of R_(comp) is removed. Further details of these components are found throughout the present specification and more particularly below.

The current supplier 1120 is connected to the resistor 1116 of R_(comp), and is used to generate a current I_(—) _(comp) . For example, the current supplier 1120 is a current sink. In another example, the current supplier 1120 includes a transconductor. In yet another example, the current I_(—) _(comp) is a ramping current that is synchronized with a PWM signal. The current I_(—) _(comp) flows through the resistor 1116 of R _(comp) and the resistor 1110 of R and generates an offset signal. For example, the offset signal is in the voltage domain. The offset signal is subtracted from a current sensing signal to generate a composite signal. For example, the current sensing signal is generated by the resistor 1114 of R_(S). The composite signal is provided to an input 1132 of the comparator 1130. For example, the composite signal is in the voltage domain and represented by V_(com). At the comparator 1130, the composite signal is compared with a predetermined threshold signal generated by the threshold generator 1160. For example, the predetermined threshold signal is the threshold voltage V_(th) _(—) _(oc). Based on the comparison, the comparator 1130 sends a signal to the PWM generator 1140. For example, the PWM generator 1140 includes a PWM comparator 1142, a logic controller 1144, and a gate driver 1146. The logic controller receives the signal sent from the comparator 1130. In another example, the PWM comparator 1142 receives the clock signal and the ramping signal generated by the oscillator 1180. The PWM generator 1140 receives the signal from the comparator 1130 and controls the switch 1170 through the gate driver 1146. For example, the gate driver 1146 generates the PWM signal. The startup system 1152 is connected to the input voltage V_(in) through the resistor 1112, and is used to control powering up of a chip for PWM control.

In one embodiment, the voltage V_(com) at the input 1132 of the comparator 1130 is V _(com) =I _(sense) ×R _(S) −I _(—) _(comp) ×(R _(comp) +R)   (Equation 21)

The comparator 1130 sends a signal to the PWM generator 1140 for turning off the switch 1170 if V_(com) reaches the threshold voltage V_(th) _(—) _(oc) as follows: I _(sense) ×R _(S) −I _(—) _(comp) ×(R _(comp) +R)=V_(th) _(—) _(oc)  (Equation 22) and I _(sense) ×R _(S) =V _(th) _(—) _(oc) +I _(—) _(comp) ×(R _(comp) +R)  (Equation 23)

The effective threshold signal I_(th) _(—) _(oc) is

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = \frac{I_{sense}}{R_{s}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 24} \right) \end{matrix}$

Therefore,

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} + \frac{I_{\_ comp} \times \left( {R_{comp} + R} \right)}{R_{s}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 25} \right) \end{matrix}$

where I_(—) _(comp) is a ramping signal whose amplitude is synchronized with the PWM signal. Different maximum widths of the PWM signal results in different magnitudes for the second term in Equation 25. For example, the larger maximum width corresponds to lower input voltage, and the smaller maximum width corresponds to higher input voltage. Accordingly, the higher input voltage results in smaller I_(th) _(—) _(oc), and the lower input voltage results in larger I_(th) _(—) _(oc). In another example, the ramping signal I_(—) _(comp) is described as follows: I_(—) _(comp) (t)=δ×(t−nT)  (Equation 26) and 0≦t≦T_(on)  (Equation 27)

where δ is a constant, and T_(on) is the maximum width of the PWM signal. For example, T_(on) corresponds to a period during which the PWM signal turns on the switch 1170. In another example, a period of the PWM signal T_(on) and T_(off) during which the PWM signal turns off the switch 1170. In yet another example, T_(on) depends on the input voltage and the maximum current, and is represented by T_(—) _(vin) corresponding to the input voltage V_(in).

Accordingly, at t=T_(on)  (Equation 28)

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} + \frac{I_{\_ comp} \times \left( {R_{comp} + R} \right)}{R_{s}}}} \\ {= {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} + \frac{\delta \times T_{\_ vin} \times \left( {R_{comp} + R} \right)}{R_{s}}}} \end{matrix} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 29} \right) \end{matrix}$

For example, T_(—) _(vin) can be expressed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {T_{\_ vin} = \frac{V_{th\_ oc} \times L_{p}}{V_{i\; n} \times R_{s}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 30} \right) \end{matrix}$

Hence

$\begin{matrix} {I_{th\_ oc} = {\frac{V_{th\_ oc}}{R_{s}} + \frac{\delta \times \left( {R_{comp} + R} \right) \times V_{th\_ oc} \times L_{p}}{V_{i\; n} \times R_{s} \times R_{s}}}} & \left( {{Equation}\mspace{20mu} 31} \right) \end{matrix}$

As shown in Equation 31, the second term on the right side is inversely proportional to V_(in). The effective threshold is lower for higher input voltage and higher for lower input voltage. By adjusting the resistor 1110 of R, the effects of “delay to output” can be compensated. For example, the system 1100 allows a maximum current that is constant over a wide range of the input voltage V_(in). In another example, the resistor 1110 is adjusted for given L_(p) and R_(S) in a switching mode converter according to Equation 31.

As discussed above and further emphasized here, Equations 1-31 are merely examples, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many variations, alternatives, and modifications. For example, Equations 7-31 are used to describe certain examples for FIGS. 5-9 and 11, but FIGS. 5-9 and 11 can operate according to methods that may be different from those of Equations 7-31.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, a programmable line-voltage-compensated current-limiting control system and a method thereof are provided. The line input voltage is sensed and received by an input-controlled current source. The current source generates a current that flows through an external resistor connecting between a current sensing terminal and a current sensing resistor R. The resulting offset voltage is proportional to the line input voltage, and is superimposed with a current sensing signal. The summation signal is provided to an over-current comparator to generate a control signal. The control signal can be used to turn off a power switch in a switching mode converter. For example, the system and the method are implemented according to the systems 500 and/or 600.

According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a programmable line-voltage-compensated current-limiting control system and a method thereof are provided. The line input voltage is sensed and received by an input-controlled current source. The current source flows through an external resistor connecting between the current source and the ground. The resulting offset voltage is proportional to the line input voltage, and is superimposed with a reference signal to generate an effective threshold signal. The effective threshold signal is compared with a current sensing signal by an over-current comparator to generate a control signal. The control signal can be used to turn off a power switch in a switch mode converter. For example, the system and the method are implemented according to the system 700.

According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a programmable line-voltage-compensated current-limiting control system and a method thereof are provided. The line input voltage is sensed by a resistor and sensing transistors connecting between the line voltage and a chip power supply terminal. As a result, a current is generated that is proportional to the line input voltage. The current is mirrored by a current mirror and/or a current amplifier to generate an input-controlled current. The input-controlled current flows through an external resistor to generate an offset signal. For example, the system and the method are implemented according to the systems 500, 600, and/or 700.

According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a programmable line-voltage-compensated current-limiting control system and a method thereof are provided. The line input voltage is divided by a voltage divider. The divide voltage is sensed and converted to an input-controlled current by a transconductor. The input-controlled current flows through an external resistor connecting between a current sensing terminal and a current sensing resistor. The resulting offset voltage is proportional to the line input voltage, and is superimposed with a current sensing signal. The summation signal is provided to an over-current comparator to generate a control signal. The control signal can be used to turn off a power switch in a switch mode converter. For example, the system and the method are implemented according to the system 800.

According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a programmable line-voltage-compensated current-limiting control system and a method thereof are provided. The line input voltage is divided by a voltage divider. The divide voltage is sensed and converted to an input-controlled current by a transconductor. The input-controlled current source flows through an external resistor connecting between the transconductor and the ground. The resulting offset voltage is proportional to the line input voltage, and is superimposed with a reference signal to generate an effective threshold signal. The effective threshold signal is compared with a current sensing signal by an over-current comparator to generate a control signal. This control signal can be used to turn off a power switch in a switch mode converter. For example, the system and the method are implemented according to the system 900.

According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a programmable line-voltage-compensated current-limiting control system and a method thereof are provided. The line input voltage is divided by a voltage divider. The divided voltage is sensed and converted by a transconductor. As a result, a current is generated that is proportional to the line input voltage. The current is mirrored by a current mirror and/or a current amplifier to generate an input-controlled current. The input-controlled current flows through an external resistor to generate an offset signal. For example, the system and the method are implemented according to the systems 800 and/or 900.

According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a programmable line-voltage-compensated current-limiting control system and a method thereof are provided. The line input voltage information is represented by the PWM width for constant current limiting. A PWM-synchronized current-ramping signal controls a current sink connected to a current sensing terminal of a chip. As a result, a current that flows through an external resistor into the chip and flows through an internal resistor in the chip is sunk by the current sink. Additionally, the current has a ramping magnitude that is synchronized with a PWM signal. The resulting offset voltage is subtracted from a current sensing signal to generate a composite signal. The composite signal is provided to an over-current comparator to generate a control signal. The control signal can be used to turn off a power switch in a switch mode converter. For example, the system and the method are implemented according to the system 1100.

According to yet another embodiment, a system for protecting a power converter includes a first comparator configured to receive a threshold signal and a first signal and to generate a comparison signal. The first signal is a sum of a second signal and a third signal, and the third signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the system includes a pulse-width-modulation generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to the comparison signal, and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and control the input current for the power converter. An amplitude for the first signal becomes larger if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger. The second signal is generated by receiving an input voltage for the power converter, converting the received input voltage to a fourth signal, and converting the fourth signal to the second signal. For example, the system is implemented according to the systems 500, 600, and/or 800.

According to yet another embodiment, a system for protecting a power converter includes a first comparator configured to receive a first signal and a second signal and to generate a comparison signal. The first signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the system includes a threshold generator configured to receive at least a third signal and generate the second signal in response to at least the third signal. The third signal is associated with an input voltage for the power converter. Moreover, the system includes a pulse-width-modulation generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to the comparison signal, and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and control the input current for the power converter. An amplitude for the second signal becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger, and the third signal is generated by receiving an input voltage for the power converter and converting the received input voltage to the third signal. For example, the system is implemented according to the systems 700 and/or 900.

According to yet another embodiment, a system for protecting a power converter includes a first comparator configured to receive a threshold signal and a first signal and to generate a comparison signal. The first signal is equal to a second signal subtracted by a third signal, and the second signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the system includes a pulse-width-modulation generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to the comparison signal, and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and control the input current for the power converter. Moreover, the system includes an oscillator coupled to the pulse-width-modulation generator and configured to generate at least a first control signal, a transconductor configured to receive the first control signal and generate a second control signal, and a current supplier configured to receive the second control signal and generate a first current in response to the second control signal, the first current being associated with the third signal. An amplitude for the first current becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger. For example, the system is implemented according to the system 1100.

According to yet another embodiment, a method for protecting a power converter includes receiving an input voltage for a power converter, converting the received input voltage to a first signal, converting the first signal to a second signal, and generating a third signal based on at least information associated with the second signal. Additionally, the method includes receiving the third signal and a threshold signal. The third signal is a sum of the second signal and a fourth signal, and the fourth signal is associated with an input current for the power converter. Moreover, the method includes generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the third signal and the threshold signal, and processing information associated with the comparison signal. Also, the method includes generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal, and controlling the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal. An amplitude for the third signal becomes larger if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger. For example, the method is implemented by the systems 500, 600, and/or 800.

According to yet another embodiment, a method for protecting a power converter includes receiving an input voltage for a power converter, converting the received input voltage to a first signal, processing information associated with the first signal, generating a second signal based on at least information associated with the first signal, and receiving the second signal and a third signal. The third signal is associated with an input current for a power converter. Additionally, the method includes generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the second signal and the third signal, processing information associated with the comparison signal, generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal, and controlling the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal. An amplitude for the second signal becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger. For example, the method is implemented by the systems 700 and/or 900.

According to yet another embodiment, a method for protecting a power converter includes generating a first signal based on at least information associated with an input current for a power converter, generating a second signal, the second signal being proportional to a ramping current, and processing information associated with the first signal and the second signal. Additionally, the method includes generating a third signal equal to the first signal subtracted by the second signal, receiving the third signal and a threshold signal, generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the third signal and the threshold signal, processing information associated with the comparison signal, generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal, and controlling the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal. An amplitude for the ramping current corresponding to a predetermined value for the input current becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger. For example, the method is implemented by the system 1100.

The present invention has various applications. In some embodiments, the systems of FIGS. 5-9 and/or 11 can be used to regulate switch-mode converters. For example, the switch-mode converters include offline flyback converters and/or forward converters. In other embodiments, the systems of FIGS. 5-9 and/or 11 allow a maximum power that is constant over a wide range of input voltage.

The present invention has various advantages. Some embodiments can provide an excellent compensation for the “delay to output” by easily adjusting an external resistor. For example, the adjustment of the external resistor takes into account converter components external to a chip for PWM control. Certain embodiments allow a maximum current and a maximum power that are constant over a wide range of input voltage. Some embodiments consume a low standby power by sharing a resistor for a sensing system with a startup system and/or a brownout protection system. For example, the resistor is shared by a sensing system and a startup system. Certain embodiments provide an excellent compensation for the “delay to output” without sensing an input voltage. For example, the pin counts for a chip for PWM control is limited. In another example, the maximum width of a PWM signal is used to represent the input voltage. Different input voltages result in different maximum widths for the PWM signal, and the different maximum widths result in different effective threshold signals. Some embodiments provide an over-current protection that can effectively protect a power converter from excessive power, thermal run away, excessive current and/or voltage stress.

Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that there are other embodiments that are equivalent to the described embodiments. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited by the specific illustrated embodiments, but only by the scope of the appended claims. 

1. A system for protecting a power converter, the system comprising: a comparator configured to receive a threshold signal and a first signal and to generate a comparison signal, the first signal being a sum of a second signal and a third signal, the third signal being associated with an input current for a power converter; a signal generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to at least the comparison signal; and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and affect the input current for the power converter; wherein: an amplitude for the first signal becomes larger if an amplitude for an input voltage becomes larger; and the second signal is generated by receiving the input voltage for the power converter, generating a fourth signal based on at least information associated with the input voltage, and generating the second signal based on at least information associated with the fourth signal.
 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the input current for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value, the predetermined value being constant with respect to the input voltage.
 3. The system of claim 1 wherein: an input power for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value; the input power is associated with the input current and the input voltage; and the predetermined value is constant with respect to the input voltage.
 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the modulation signal turns off the switch if the comparison signal indicates the amplitude for the first signal is equal to or larger than an amplitude for the threshold signal.
 5. The system of claim 1, and further comprising a first resistor configured to convert the input current for the power converter to a first voltage, the first voltage being the third signal.
 6. The system of claim 5, and further comprising: a current supply configured to generate a first current, the first current being associated with the input voltage for the power converter; and a second resistor configured to convert the first current to a second voltage; wherein: the first current is the fourth signal; and the second voltage is the second signal.
 7. The system of claim 6, and further comprising: a third resistor configured to convert the input voltage to a second current; and a sensing system configured to receive the second current and generate a third current in response to the second current.
 8. The system of claim 7 wherein the current supply is configured to generate the first current in response to the third current.
 9. The system of claim 5, and further comprising: a transconductor configured to generate a first current, the first current being associated with the input voltage for the power converter; and a second resistor configured to convert the first current to a second voltage; wherein: the first current is the fourth signal; and the second voltage is the second signal.
 10. The system of claim 9 wherein the second resistor is coupled to the first resistor and the comparator.
 11. The system of claim 10 wherein the second resistor is not on a chip for pulse-width-modulation control.
 12. The system of claim 9, and further comprising: a voltage divider configured to receive the input voltage and generate a third voltage; and a sensing system configured to receive the third voltage and generate a fourth voltage in response to the third voltage.
 13. The system of claim 12 wherein the transconductor is configured to generate the first current in response to the fourth voltage.
 14. A system for protecting a power converter, the system comprising: a comparator configured to receive a first signal and a second signal and to generate a comparison signal, the first signal being associated with an input current for a power converter; a threshold generator configured to receive at least a third signal and generate the second signal in response to at least the third signal, the third signal being associated with an input voltage for the power converter; a signal generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to at least the comparison signal; and a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and affect the input current for the power converter; wherein: an amplitude for the second signal becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger; and the third signal is generated by receiving the input voltage for the power converter and generating the third signal based on at least information associated with the input voltage.
 15. The system of claim 14 wherein the input current for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value, the predetermined value being constant with respect to the input voltage.
 16. The system of claim 14 wherein: an input power for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value; the input power is associated with the input current and the input voltage; and the predetermined value is constant with respect to the input voltage.
 17. The system of claim 14 wherein the modulation signal turns off the switch if the comparison signal indicates an amplitude for the first signal is equal to or larger than the amplitude for the second signal.
 18. The system of claim 14, and further comprising a first resistor configured to convert the input current for the power converter to a first voltage, the first voltage being the first signal.
 19. The system of claim 18, and further comprising: a current supply configured to generate a first current, the first current being associated with the input voltage for the power converter; and a second resistor configured to convert the first current to a second voltage; wherein the second voltage is the third signal.
 20. The system of claim 18, and further comprising: a transconductor configured to generate a first current, the first current being associated with the input voltage for the power converter; and a second resistor configured to convert the first current to a second voltage; wherein the second voltage is the third signal.
 21. A system for protecting a power converter, the system comprising: a comparator configured to receive a threshold signal and a first signal and to generate a comparison signal, the first signal being equal to a second signal subtracted by a third signal, the second signal being associated with an input current for a power converter; a signal generator configured to receive the comparison signal and generate a modulation signal in response to at least the comparison signal; a switch configured to receive the modulation signal and affect the input current for the power converter; an oscillator coupled to the signal generator and configured to generate at least a fourth signal; and a current supply configured to receive the fourth signal and generate a first current in response to the fourth signal, the first current being associated with the third signal; wherein an amplitude for the first current becomes smaller if an amplitude for an input voltage becomes larger.
 22. The system of claim 21 wherein the input current for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value, the predetermined value being constant with respect to the input voltage.
 23. The system of claim 21 wherein: an input power for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value; the input power is associated with the input current and the input voltage; and the predetermined value is constant with respect to the input voltage.
 24. The system of claim 21 wherein the modulation signal turns off the switch if the comparison signal indicates an amplitude for the first signal is equal to or larger than an amplitude for the threshold signal.
 25. The system of claim 21, and further comprising a first resistor configured to convert the input current for the power converter to a first voltage, the first voltage being the second signal.
 26. A method for protecting a power converter, the method comprising: receiving an input voltage for a power converter; converting the input voltage to a first signal; generating a second signal based on at least information associated with the first signal; receiving the second signal and a threshold signal, the second signal being a sum of the first signal and a third signal, the third signal being associated with an input current for the power converter; generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the second signal and the threshold signal; processing information associated with the comparison signal; generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal; and affecting the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal; wherein an amplitude for the second signal becomes larger if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger.
 27. The method of claim 26 wherein the input current for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value, the predetermined value being constant with respect to the input voltage.
 28. The method of claim 26 wherein: an input power for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value; the input power is associated with the input current and the input voltage; and the predetermined value is constant with respect to the input voltage.
 29. The method of claim 26 wherein the process of affecting the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal includes reducing the input current if the comparison signal indicates the amplitude for the second signal is equal to or larger than an amplitude for the threshold signal.
 30. A method for protecting a power converter, the method comprising: receiving an input voltage for a power converter; processing information associated with the input voltage; generating a first signal based on at least information associated with the input voltage; receiving the first signal and a second signal, the second signal being associated with an input current for a power converter; generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the first signal and the second signal; processing information associated with the comparison signal; generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal; and affecting the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal; wherein an amplitude for the first signal becomes smaller if an amplitude for the input voltage becomes larger.
 31. The method of claim 30 wherein the input current for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value, the predetermined value being constant with respect to the input voltage.
 32. The method of claim 30 wherein: an input power for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value; the input power is associated with the input current and the input voltage; and the predetermined value is constant with respect to the input voltage.
 33. The method of claim 30 wherein the process of affecting the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal includes reducing the input current if the comparison signal indicates an amplitude for the second signal is equal to or larger than the amplitude for the first signal.
 34. A method for protecting a power converter, the method comprising: generating a first signal based on at least information associated with an input current for a power converter; generating a second signal, the second signal being associated with a ramping current; processing information associated with the first signal and the second signal; generating a third signal equal to the first signal subtracted by the second signal; receiving the third signal and a threshold signal; generating a comparison signal based on at least information associated with the third signal and the threshold signal; processing information associated with the comparison signal; generating a modulation signal based on at least information associated with the comparison signal; and affecting the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal; wherein an amplitude for the second signal becomes smaller if an amplitude for an input voltage becomes larger.
 35. The method of claim 34 wherein the input current for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value, the predetermined value being constant with respect to the input voltage.
 36. The method of claim 34 wherein: an input power for the power converter is limited to a predetermined value; the input power is associated with the input current and the input voltage; and the predetermined value is constant with respect to the input voltage.
 37. The method of claim 34 wherein the process of affecting the input current for the power converter in response to the modulation signal includes reducing the input current if the comparison signal indicates an amplitude for the third signal is equal to or larger than an amplitude for the threshold signal. 